- US: 1.866.499.3750 │ EU: +44 (0) 20.7440.8500
- Search
- Contact Us
- Support
- Company
- Blog
- Customer Login
Managing Survey Response Quality with Category and Method Exclusions
Submitted by John Fitzpatrick on January 28, 2011 - 13:31
The TrueSample team is continually exploring the nuances of survey data quality that impact the results of online market research. Our goal is to continue to ask questions and explore the possibilities as we guide the industry in assuring the highest possible data quality in quantitative market research.
Today, we’ll look at category and method exclusions – these are often discussed as good avenues for managing survey response quality. In the context of these discussions, a “category” refers to a type of product or service (for example, skin care products) and a “method” refers to a type of study being conducted (like a concept test).
Many in the Market Research industry are interested in category and method exclusions because there is a belief that, in some cases, presenting the same respondents with several similar surveys in a short period of time may cause them to respond differently than they otherwise would. This could be due to boredom, an increased ability to game the survey, or other reasons. But the results are the same—an inability to make valid apples-to-apples comparisons across respondents, and a lack of trust in the resulting data. As if that weren’t bad enough, sending respondents too many surveys that seem too much alike may eventually stop them from participating in market research altogether.
So how do we avoid such problems? First, we need to track the appropriate categories and methods for each survey. Next, we need to be able to tie together that survey’s respondents and the date they entered the survey with the categories and methods we’re tracking. That’s all the information that we need to make the exclusions – we would be able to answer a request like, “Give me a sample of women in their 20s, but exclude anyone who took a survey about makeup in the last 30 days.”
Unfortunately, the solutions that exist today are often quite fragmented and time consuming, requiring researchers to use multiple tools and multiple steps to make category and method exclusions. In some cases, researchers are able to make these exclusions only with previous respondents to their own surveys. To overcome these hurdles, companies with a commitment to data quality (like TrueSample) are working on developing technology solutions that will make this effort fast, simple and with less fragmentation across the industry.
About the MarketTools Blog
Categories
Latest Posts
MarketTools Blog Team
Dan Bot
Research Manager, Market Research
Joe Camirand
VP, Research & Consulting Services, CustomerSat
Greg Crowley
Senior Project Manager, CustomerSat
Alan Cutler
VP, Client Development, Market Research
Alexandra de Almeida
Senior Project Manager, CustomerSat
Jolinda Decad
Senior Research Consultant, CustomerSat
Mark Glassberg
Regional Vice President, Market Research
Elena Hutchison
Research Consultant, CustomerSat
Hank Khost
Senior Research Manager, Market Research
Greg Marek
Vice President, Corporate Marketing
Mike Milburn
Manager, Relationship Services, CustomerSat
Heather Mitchell
Senior Project Manager, CustomerSat
Jay Pluhar
Vice President, Strategic Accounts, Market Research
Larry Praml
Director, All Channel Tracker, Market Research
Kathleen Relias
VP, Client Development, Market Research
Russ Rubin
SVP, Client Services, Market Research
April Turner
Sr. Product Marketing Manager, Market Research
Copyright © 2012 MarketTools, Inc. All rights reserved.






Post new comment