Do No Harm: The Survey Process Is More than just the Survey Instrument

customersurvey_pen.jpgAs Voice of the Customer / customer loyalty researchers, we recognize that at the root of every loyal or disloyal customer is a history of interactions—calls with sales, tech support, maybe an installer or a billing specialist.  We know that each one of these customer interactions has the power to impact customer loyalty.

The survey process is an interaction as well.  It is a chance for the customer to tell you how well you are performing.  Like any other interaction, it can be handled well or handled poorly.

Our best advice to researchers designing their feedback program is to channel the principal tenet of the Hippocratic Oath, “Do No Harm”.  This should be the primary consideration in the decision making process at every step of designing/implementing a satisfaction measurement program.

Obviously the first step is to work with the right partner so you know you’ve designed an excellent survey (just the right length, focused questions, only the required open-ended questions, etc.).  This is critical.  But don’t spend weeks refining and vetting the survey instrument, just to leave other key parts of the interaction to the last minute (or even until after the survey is live!).  Here are some other areas that should be given equal consideration when designing a feedback program.

Pre-Survey:
A personalized email is generally preferred to a generic greeting.  However, personalization requires a reliable database.  I would rather receive an email with “Dear Valued Customer” than any of the following:

Dear MIKE MILBURN  (why are you yelling at me?)
Dear mike milburn  (only acceptable if gauging opinion on the poetry of ee cummings)
Dear milburn mike  (do I even need to explain?)
Dear tbd unknown  (am I a client of yours or not?)
Dear Mrs. Milburn  (would be ok if it was for my wife, this one wasn’t)
(By the way, avoid Mr., Ms., or Mrs. unless you are absolutely sure, and even then, don’t)

Is your database ready for the survey process?  Even if it is accurate 99.5% of the time, 10,000 emails could yield 50 upset/turned off invitees.

Follow up on specific requests:
Often companies will include a survey question asking respondents if they want someone from the company to contact them.  If a respondent says yes, then contact them — you have now set an expectation that you need to follow through with.  It sounds simple, but many companies turn this kind of opportunity to interact with an individual respondent into a reason for the respondents to feel as if the company doesn’t value them when they neglect to follow up.  Loyalty is an emotion; hurt feelings will quickly damage the relationship.

Also, companies may ask if the respondent needs certain materials, documentation, etc.  Again, if someone says they  need it, provide it.  I have seen programs where, 6 months in, the client has removed this type of question because they realized no one in their company had been following up on it since the program began.  That is 6 months of setting expectations and not fulfilling any of them.

Do you have the infrastructure in place to deal with the volume of contact or information requests?  If not, you are better off not asking these questions until you do.

Survey follow-up (in general):
The ability to follow up in real time with respondents who give low scores to your survey can be very powerful.  Imagine this from the respondent’s point of view:  Let's say I had a bad experience, I expressed it in your survey and that same day I get a phone call from your company.

“Hello, is this Mike Milburn?  Thank you for providing feedback recently on your service experience.  I understand things were not handled up to our usual standards.  I’d like to take a minute to discuss…”

Think about it.  I am no longer a nameless person throwing my feedback into a void.  Someone saw my responses and acted on it.  I’m now part of the solution.

Much better than this call:  “Is this Mike?  Yeah, Mike, why did you give us a 2 on courtesy and professionalism?”  (Hmm, I wonder.)

Companies spend millions of dollars putting the right messaging campaigns together.  Yet, when following up with respondents in critical one-on-one interactions, these events are often left to the whims of the individual reaching out to the client.

Do you have a scripted, structured follow-up mechanism in place?  If not, how do you know these interactions are being handled in a consistent, professional manner?

A feedback program is another opportunity to interact with your clients.  How you interact with them is up to you.  At every step of the process, let “Do No Harm” guide your decisions.

Share |

I love it when "how to"

I love it when "how to" articles such as this take on humorous undertones. The email still has me laughing. Thanks for this, there are some really great tips and tricks here along with some practical rules.

Mike, Your points here are

Mike,

Your points here are well thought out and well stated. Rapid response to customer service issues uncovered during surveys has proven effective in driving customer loyalty and advocacy scores upward in our business. I am also of the opinion that no matter what a customer reports during a survey that each and every customer should be called to at least thank them for taking time to complete a survey. Ideally this should be done by the manager of the office that serveed that customer. We actually created a follow-up script to help our local offices get started.

The other gem in this blog is the statement “Loyalty is an emotion” which is absolutely true yet so many would disbelieve this and reject the notion out of hand. We tend to think in the B2B world that emotion plays little to no role in customer decision-making or customer loyalty. Emotion plays into every decision and is the first consideration whether anyone choosses to admit that or not. What many people do is follow emotion with “objective” data in order to justify their emotional decition since few want to admit they made a decision based on something seemingly weak.

Thanks.

Thank you for your comments

Thank you for your comments Karl, I am glad the blog was well received. I obviously agree with the emotion piece of it, I think it is underestimated in many interactions.

Mike

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
   __     ____    _____   _  _   
/ /_ |___ \ |___ / | || |
| '_ \ __) | |_ \ | || |_
| (_) | / __/ ___) | |__ _|
\___/ |_____| |____/ |_|
Enter the code depicted in ASCII art style.

About the MarketTools Blog

The MarketTools Blog covers Enterprise Feedback Management (EFM) and Market Research topics, with a focus on customer insight and customer satisfaction.

Subscribe
 

Susbcribe to MarketTools Blog Join us on Linkedin Follow us on Twitter Join us on Facebook

Subscribe by Email:

Enter your email address:

Blog Honors

MarketTools Blog Team


Dan Bot
Research Manager, Market Research

Joe Camirand
VP, Research & Consulting Services, CustomerSat

Michael Conklin
Chief Methodologist, Market Research

Jolinda Decad
Senior Research Consultant, CustomerSat

Mark Glassberg
Regional Vice President, Market Research

Elena Hutchison
Research Consultant, CustomerSat

Hank Khost
Senior Research Manager, Market Research

Ben Langleben
Strategic Client Director, Market Research

Greg Marek
Vice President, Corporate Marketing

Mike Milburn
Manager, Relationship Services, CustomerSat

Heather Mitchell
Senior Project Manager, CustomerSat

Jay Pluhar
Vice President, Strategic Accounts, Market Research

Larry Praml
Director, All Channel Tracker, Market Research

Kathleen Relias
VP, Client Development, Market Research

Russ Rubin
SVP, Client Services, Market Research

April Turner
Sr. Product Marketing Manager, Market Research