Benchmarking NPS to Measure Your Customer Loyalty

CustomerSat_NPS_widget_sm.PNGOne of the questions clients focused on customer satisfaction and loyalty often ask me is “how do my NPS scores compare to others?” (For those unfamiliar with the term, NPS, or Net Promoter Score*, is a metric for measuring customer loyalty.  NPS is the percentage of  “Promoters”, or active, loyal customers likely to recommend your company, minus the percentage of “Detractors” who may spread negative word of mouth.) 

While NPS benchmarks by industry and best-in-class scores exist, there are really no better scores to benchmark yourself against than your own.  Really, the most important thing to remember is that you are looking for improvement.  When thinking about comparing your scores with other companies, please remember that there are many things that can affect your NPS score – including the industry you’re in, the type of products you sell, where you sell your products, who you sell your products to, the economy, etc. 

Also, remember that NPS is only a single metric, one of many that should be tracked and monitored to measure performance.  NPS should not be relied upon alone, any more than a pilot would rely on a single gauge in the cockpit to monitor his flight.  Use NPS in conjunction with overall customer satisfaction scores and other actionable measures (like detailed performance metrics, individual customers’ scores, etc.) to garner the greatest insights into your performance.

Based upon conversations with clients using NPS, I would suggest the following strategy for benchmarking NPS:

1)    Establish your own benchmark

  • The only benchmark that is applicable for you is your own. Measure for a time period (a quarter, a year) and then set the average as your baseline.
  • Set a goal for increasing your NPS score year over year. The important thing here is to improve.  Do not get caught up in determining by how much.  How much depends on several factors that are usually out of your control – budget, ability to make changes based on data, resources to affect change, internal company culture, economy, etc.
  • Year over year, or rolling 6-12 months is the best way to trend, as you will most likely see dramatic changes in scores from month to month or quarter to quarter.  See point #2 below.

2)    Watch your mix

  • Develop a sample plan that allows you to keep your survey population mix as comparable as possible from time period to time period.  For example, if 75% of the people you survey in  Q1 are in North America and in only 40% of the people you survey in Q2 are in North America, you will see dramatic differences in your trending.
  • Typical things to think about when developing your NPS survey sample plan include:
    -    What type of people you are surveying?  Titles, positions, and other factors affect survey scores.
    -    Where are the people are located? Certain countries will typically not give high scores of 9 or 10 out of 10 when responding to surveys, so is NPS the right metric when measuring that region?  Whatever you decide, the mix of countries should be comparable.
    -    How long have your survey respondents been clients? If your Q1 sample is 75% customers that have been with you 3 years or more and your Q2 sample contains only 40% of customers that have been with you 3 years or more, this could dramatically affect your trending.
    -    Where in the survey are you asking the question? If you ask it at the beginning, you will get a higher response to that question, but only a “top of mind” answer.  If you ask at the end, you will get fewer responses to this question, but the responses you get will be more thought out after answering all the other questions.
    -    What languages did you use for the survey? If the survey was written in English and fielded to people whose primary language is not English, they may not truly understand the question.  When asking in other languages, it is imperative that the translation is done in a way that explains the question properly.

These are just some of the many things to think about when using NPS as a metric, but perhaps most importantly, don’t lose sight of the fact that there are many other metrics out there that may be more useful to your organization – stay tuned for further discussion on other useful metrics to consider.
 

NPSdisclaimer2.PNG

Share |

I believe in

I believe in self-benchmarking NPS rather than looking externally. First of all, two NPS programs are never exactly the same so you'd be starting off at a disadvantage. In our organization, we need to be carefully with internal assessments of NPS because we have several survey initiatives that include the NPS question and the surveys are all different with different objectives. We've had to become quite specific over time. When anyone asks me what our NPS score is I typically respond with "Which one of the 350 NPS scores we have documents are you interested in?" which is not a wise-crack answer nor is it a trivial question. We have a service transaction NPS for the company as a whole and for each of our 150 regional geographies. We have an NPS for each of our product or business segments and one for each of several major vertical markets we serve. We have an NPS based on several categories of customer tenure, and NPS based on customer share of wallet. We've segmented NPS based on customer type, relationship versus transactional measurement, key account versus national account versus contract customer versus non-contract customer--name your segment and we have an NPS. This is the real reason why it's impossible to compare one organization's very specifically derived NPS to another organization and expect that comparison to hold validity. Not to mention the difficulty in comparing NPS considering the variety of scales the metric is measured on.

Speaking of measurement scales, we currently use a 5-choice scale to measure NPS and are considering moving to a Reichheld scale which is essentially an 11-point scale. The reason is that the Reichheld scale has all of the research behind it and we have found the 5-choice scale to have its own basis of confusion especially when the deployment method is email and there isn't the agent on the phone to help clarify it. The reason we prefer the Reichheld scale over the 10-point scale is that 0 hardly ever gets confused as the top score of anything whereas a 1 and a 10 could conceivably become confusing unless the survey taker is reads the instructions carefully. We have found through experience that even the most carefully instructed survey can be completed incorrectly and quite inadvertently by the recipient.

Hi Karl, Thanks for your

Hi Karl,

Thanks for your comments- that's a lot of NPS! Very interesting about the 11 point scale- you make a really good point about the confusion of which is the high score and zero is a great way around this. Very creative! Always appreciate your insight-

Thanks,
Jodi Koskella

Harvard Business Review in

Harvard Business Review in July of 2010 published a survey of approximately 75,000 customers. The results suggest that the customer satisfaction score and even the net promoter score were third and second in comparison to the Customer Effortless Score in determining repeat business. This score is directly related to the tried and true question of How Easy Are We To Do Business With? Leanne Hoagland--Smith, author of be the Red Jacket in a sea of gray suits - http://bit.ly/1Q9mnV

Thanks for highlighting the

Thanks for highlighting the impact of using NPS on a global program. NPS can be significantly higher in US that other countries where 10's are less common. I highly recommend benchmarking each country versus it's own history and avoiding the temptation to do global comparisons. If a global KPI is desired, stick with a top 3 box measure on an overall satisfaction measure that is shared across countries. Top 3 box is wider measure (8-10) and tends to "neutralize" the geographic differences in scoring.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
   ___    ____    ____     ___  
( _ ) |___ \ | ___| / _ \
/ _ \ __) | |___ \ | (_) |
| (_) | / __/ ___) | \__, |
\___/ |_____| |____/ /_/
Enter the code depicted in ASCII art style.

About the MarketTools Blog

The MarketTools Blog covers Enterprise Feedback Management (EFM) and Market Research topics, with a focus on customer insight and customer satisfaction.

Subscribe
 

Susbcribe to MarketTools Blog Join us on Linkedin Follow us on Twitter Join us on Facebook

Subscribe by Email:

Enter your email address:

Blog Honors

MarketTools Blog Team


Dan Bot
Research Manager, Market Research

Joe Camirand
VP, Research & Consulting Services, CustomerSat

Michael Conklin
Chief Methodologist, Market Research

Jolinda Decad
Senior Research Consultant, CustomerSat

Mark Glassberg
Regional Vice President, Market Research

Elena Hutchison
Research Consultant, CustomerSat

Hank Khost
Senior Research Manager, Market Research

Ben Langleben
Strategic Client Director, Market Research

Greg Marek
Vice President, Corporate Marketing

Mike Milburn
Manager, Relationship Services, CustomerSat

Heather Mitchell
Senior Project Manager, CustomerSat

Jay Pluhar
Vice President, Strategic Accounts, Market Research

Larry Praml
Director, All Channel Tracker, Market Research

Kathleen Relias
VP, Client Development, Market Research

Russ Rubin
SVP, Client Services, Market Research

April Turner
Sr. Product Marketing Manager, Market Research